Roman vs Grecian pools compared
Roman vs Grecian pool, side by side: figures at the same nominal size, strengths, trade-offs and a straight recommendation.
Roman
Semicircular ends — formal elegance with a full swim lane
Strengths
- · Formal, architectural presence
- · Full-length swim lane in the straight body
- · Curved ends are natural homes for wide steps
Trade-offs
- · The curved ends add forming and tiling cost
- · Slightly less floor area than a rectangle of the same length
Grecian
Cut corners, octagonal poise — formal without curves
Strengths
- · Formal geometry with straight-cut simplicity
- · Nearly a rectangle's swim length and floor area
- · Angled corners suit corner steps and benches
Trade-offs
- · Eight wall angles mean more formwork joints
- · Corner cuts reduce floor space slightly
At a glance
| Roman | Grecian | |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal size | 8 × 4 m | 8 × 4 m |
| Water surface | 28.5 m² | 30.2 m² |
| Volume | 42.5 m³ | 44.9 m³ |
| Perimeter | 20.6 m | 21.8 m |
| Footprint efficiency | 89% | 94% |
Our take
Two classical answers: the Roman softens its ends with arcs, the Grecian sharpens its corners with 45° cuts. Curves and a flowing staircase — Roman. Crisp symmetry, straight tiling and corner benches — Grecian.
Your pool is a few clicks away
Open the designer and see your garden's pool in 3D — free, right now.
Start designing — it's freeFree · no signup · runs in your browser