Rectangular vs Grecian pools compared
Rectangular vs Grecian pool, side by side: figures at the same nominal size, strengths, trade-offs and a straight recommendation.
Rectangular
The classic — clean lines, maximum swim length
Strengths
- · Most usable swim length per square metre
- · Simplest to build, tile and cover
- · Automatic and slatted covers fit perfectly
Trade-offs
- · Sharp corners collect debris in the corners' eddies
- · Can feel formal in a soft, planted garden
Grecian
Cut corners, octagonal poise — formal without curves
Strengths
- · Formal geometry with straight-cut simplicity
- · Nearly a rectangle's swim length and floor area
- · Angled corners suit corner steps and benches
Trade-offs
- · Eight wall angles mean more formwork joints
- · Corner cuts reduce floor space slightly
At a glance
| Rectangular | Grecian | |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal size | 8 × 4 m | 8 × 4 m |
| Water surface | 32.0 m² | 30.2 m² |
| Volume | 48.0 m³ | 44.9 m³ |
| Perimeter | 24.0 m | 21.8 m |
| Footprint efficiency | 100% | 94% |
Our take
Nearly identical to swim in; the Grecian buys a formal, octagonal presence for slightly more formwork and slightly less floor. If your garden plan is symmetric and axial, the Grecian rewards it; otherwise the rectangle's simplicity wins.
Your pool is a few clicks away
Open the designer and see your garden's pool in 3D — free, right now.
Start designing — it's freeFree · no signup · runs in your browser