Oval vs Kidney pools compared
Oval vs Kidney pool, side by side: figures at the same nominal size, strengths, trade-offs and a straight recommendation.
Oval
A gentle ellipse — soft geometry that still swims well
Strengths
- · Elegant, timeless silhouette
- · No corners: great circulation, easy cleaning
- · The long axis keeps a genuine swim lane
Trade-offs
- · Less floor area than a rectangle of the same length
- · Coping and tiles need curved cuts
Kidney
The free-form classic — a pool that looks grown, not built
Strengths
- · Blends into planting like no straight shape can
- · The waist creates two natural zones
- · No corners: excellent circulation
Trade-offs
- · No straight swim lane
- · Curved formwork and coping raise build cost
At a glance
| Oval | Kidney | |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal size | 8 × 4 m | 8 × 4 m |
| Water surface | 25.1 m² | 18.2 m² |
| Volume | 37.5 m³ | 27.6 m³ |
| Perimeter | 19.4 m | 18.6 m |
| Footprint efficiency | 78% | 57% |
Our take
Both are all-curve shapes; the oval stays symmetric and composed, the kidney goes organic and asymmetric. Formal garden with curves — oval. Naturalistic planting, boulders, a waterfall — the kidney was born for it.
Your pool is a few clicks away
Open the designer and see your garden's pool in 3D — free, right now.
Start designing — it's freeFree · no signup · runs in your browser